" /> Last Chance Cafe: February 2007 Archives

« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

February 23, 2007

I Take It All Back

I just watched this video and I now take back everything nice I've ever said about Hillary Clinton (which admittedly hasn't been all that much).

Having not really paid attention to the television for a couple of years, only reading stuff on the internet, I had forgotten how much this woman gets on my nerves when she speaks. I don't care anymore about policies, politics, positions or pork- were I to find myself back in the US for this election cycle being exposed to her smarmy insincere mother knows best I am afraid I'd have the urge to gouge my eyes out.

Heed The Goracle

You can't make this stuff up.

"Actually, I'm hoping to become an ambassador for climate change. That's one of his programs."

So saith a FOG (Fan Of Gore) to a reporter of the Toronto Star, possibly looking for work. Shortly afterward, beaming bullshit to the crowd (though this may have been the most earnest part of his shtick):

"I wish Canadians could have voted in our elections,'' he observed, after the resounding applause.

I can't wait for the Oscars.

Another Senior Moment

I wasn't going to post on this one, but it turned up on Foxnews.com this morning.

I've got about two years under my belt here in Costa Rica and am just about through with it. Last night I read the above linked story about a group of senior citizens on a cruise taking a side trip off the boat while docked in Limon, Costa Rica. They were approached by three would be thieves, at least one of them armed, and they decided not to be victims. Two of the thieves ran off and one woke up dead at the hospital.

The tourists left on their Carnival cruise ship after the incident and Hernandez (police chief of Limon) said authorities do not plan to press any charges against them. "They were in their right to defend themselves after being held up," he said.

Costa Rica is widely known for its scenery, rainforests and beaches with long smooth waves that are ideal for new surfers. My brother honeymooned here and his praise for the place was a significant deciding factor for my move. It is in fact is a beautiful country, but it seems to continually shoot itself in the foot.

Petty and not-so-petty crime is a problem, and the police and judicial system are not so good at addressing it. The courts operate like a revolving door for criminals so the cops don't make a big effort to arrest people. Regular people have to fend for themselves for the most part, the upswing of which is that folks are quite fond of 'Citizen José' stories detailing the foiling of various criminal activities, especially when it involves killing one of the perps.

I witnessed this phenomenon for the first time watching the news one night. The report was about an attempted jewelry store robbery. The people in the street were all smiles, which was in contrast to the serious expression of the reporters. In the interviews the witnesses and lookie-loos all expressed their pleasure at the one dead and one wounded. The storeowner or employee (I forget which) responsible for the takedown was a local hero.

Except for the inevitable 'news' accounts for the next couple of days our senior Zorros are not likely to be further disturbed for their misadventure.

The cruise line said the guests were questioned by local law enforcement and then returned to the ship. The ship's departure from Limon was slightly delayed to await their return.

"Slightly delayed" sounds about right. The police are happy that the only detained suspect wasn't about to protest his innocence (from an obvious lack of breath) and that they wouldn't have to make an effort to track down the other two- for lack of available witnesses. The tourists were happy that they weren't stuck in some two-bit country waiting for some kind of investigation to 'clear them' of wrongdoing. It's a win-win kind of thing, except for the rest of the poor bastards stuck living here that lack reasonable police protection.

What you don't hear about much in the travel brochures is that two former Presidents are currently under house arrest and one is on the lam giving speeches on global warming. Were the latter to return here Costa Rica could be on track to set a record for ex presidential detention.

But the fun is about to end for me as I'll be leaving this interesting land in about two weeks, heading slightly further south to another offbeat locale to await the arrival of another infamous ex-Presidente. It's another border crossing and customs inspection, another payoff to the local authorities, and another Miami post office box to forward my mail. Should be fun.

February 20, 2007

Not So Jolly Roger

People are talking about flags. My brother, born and bred in New Jersey, flies a Confederate flag on his pickup truck, and as a kid had one hanging on his bedroom wall. He still has it somewhere. Why does he do it? He's a rebel. He loves NASCAR. He goes fishing in South Carolina. He also goes fishing in Canada.

Each unit in the military has their own flags- see some here:

These are called 'colors.' If each military unit has a flag does that mean we have to worry about them deserting en masse or declaring war on each other? I think not.

The term applies to the Crips and the Bloods, though with them their colors are displayed on their fancy kerchiefs. They may or may not be model citizens. You may also notice the back of a Hell's Angel's motorcycle jacket. Colors.

It's normal to 'not like' someone else's colors. That's because colors are personal. Think about the phrase 'rally around the flag.' The colors of the United States of America aren't displayed on everybody's front lawn. Something has to happen- like 9/11- to wake people up to remember they 'have' colors. As a matter of fact there's always a 'news' story when needed about somebody's condo association refusing to let grandma fly Old Glory. These colors don't run, buddy. At least for this news cycle.

Police units have colors. And what do you think all those bagpipes and kilts at funerals are all about?

Where is everybody's head at with this stuff?

Ace at Ace of Spades flies the Jolly Roger with a Mencken quote that in more polite society may be viewed as an incitement to violence. Do we pull the plug on his site?

Some people do use colors to incite; it's the nature of colors. Any colors. See? My group's better than yours. It's something those stupid 'tribal' hippies never get, at least not consciously. Let my freak flag fly.

Hillary says she wants the State of South Carolina to remove the Confederate Flag from the Statehouse grounds.

"I think about how many South Carolinians have served in our military and who are serving today under our flag and I believe that we should have one flag that we all pay honor to, as I know that most people in South Carolina do every single day"...

Glenn Reynolds agrees with her. What's next, Jack Murtha sponsoring a Democratic bill requiring everyone to recite the pledge of allegiance at basketball games?

February 18, 2007

You Might Want To Put Some Ice On That

Brit Hume on Jack Murtha

Starting A New Category- Election '08

I could be reading way too much into this, but…

Instapundit links to a Daily Kos entry that says of Hillary Clinton's vote for the Iraq war:

I don't want her to apologize. I want her to say, "I made a mistake." Edwards did it. Just about every other Democrat who idiotically trusted this president and supported the war has done it. Had Hillary done this last year, the issue would be moot.

And does she really want to argue that her vote wasn't wrong?

Apparently so.

Kos not only can't believe that a Democrat would have an opinion other than his own, but also can't believe they would stick by it after being exposed to the 'truth.' Here's the kicker:

Today she lost my potential vote. I doubt I'm the only person in this position. Thankfully, as Hillary so helpfully pointed out, the rest of the field 1) didn't make the mistake to begin with, or 2) aren't afraid to admit their mistakes.

Hillary:

"If the most important thing to any of you is choosing someone who did not cast that vote or has said his vote was a mistake, then there are others to choose from."

That is as decisive, independent and presidential a statement I've heard from Hillary. It's the voice of someone taking responsibility and refusing to kowtow to an important political constituency. Bravo.

Here's the ego talking:

With California moving up its primary, my vote will actually matter next year. And now I can officially narrow down my choices to Edwards, Obama, and Richardson. [Update: Clark as well, if he ever decides to run. Some of the others could be possibilities. Hillary joins only Kucinich and Biden on my "no way" list.]

Sounds like a load off his mind. No more throwing bones 'cause she's a chick-minority and all. They have Pelosi. It is revealing that 'truthiness' isn't an issue. Kos doesn't care what Hillary believes, but as Internet Torquemada he needs her to say the words. [I want her to say, "I made a mistake."]

The nutroots smell success after having thrown Lieberman under the train. It doesn't matter that they lost the election and ruined their candidate; it's about power, the oldest aphrodisiac in the book.

As far as Hillary's statement, her advisors seem to have seen how helpful the nutroots can be by observing the sinking or sunken Edwards campaign and decided they don't need that kind of assistance. They've also seen Joe Lieberman steamroll the competition as an independent. By all but forfeiting the Democratic Primary to the far left she is free to go after Giuliani way early.

So much for my prognosticating Hillary's strategy. Under the fold is where I see this the shadows of this scenario playing out.

Also, an update all the way at the bottom:

Rudy has the lead in all polls against pretty much any challenger D or R; Hillary included. As a Republican that considers the war important I have no doubt that he will prosecute it to the full extent of his abilities. As a New Yorker literally inhaling the victims of 9/11 this is personal for him. Which is what scares me.

As a U.S. Attorney in New York Giuliani was the first law enforcement officer to use the RICO act to prosecute a non-organized crime figure. He went hard after the little people to get to the big fish, Michael Milken. I'm not here to defend Milken, only to point out that he was obviously not an organized crime figure, and not the kind of person the RICO statute was intended for. Rudy went ruthlessly after a fly with a sledgehammer.

Other Republicans are uncomfortable with his position on abortion, which makes it a wash for Hillary. We had a tease of a showdown between Rudy and Hillary for Senate until Rudy got sick and skeletons started crawling out of his closet. People want to see this fight.

In other news, the not so liberal Jonah Goldberg has also expressed his frustrations with the intense politics surrounding the war. He asks, "What if it takes a Democrat?" The idea is if there really is a clash of civilizations coming we need both Democrats and Republicans on board, and the sooner the better:

Only a handful of people on the Left — and far too few liberals — see radical Islamists as a bigger threat than George W. Bush.

These are my thoughts as well. He makes the impolitic point:

No, the argument, felt in places we don’t talk about at cocktail parties (vide A Few Good Men), is that the Democrats have been such irresponsible backseat drivers that they have to be forced to take the wheel to grasp how treacherous the road ahead is.

He describes having the thought as

like the whisper of one gusting like a sudden draft through the rafters of the conservative house, causing some to look toward the attic and ask fearfully, "What was that?"

But there it is, published in the leading conservative magazine, opening the door a crack. Following these 'whispers' and the insanely childish non-binding resolution fiasco, what other Democratic candidate exists that has modicum of respectability on the war besides Hillary? If the left pushes and Hillary holds, she will owe them nothing, and we know that her job is to regain the legacy that Bill foolishly dawdled away. She may do the right thing for all the wrong reasons, but out of the Democratic contenders she's the only one so far inclined to do the right thing for any reason.

Update: Who knows why she changed gears, and why Kos didn't include the following bolded line in his critique?

"I have to say, if the most important thing to any of you is choosing someone who did not cast that vote or said his vote was a mistake, then there are others to choose from. But for me, the most important thing now is trying to end this war."

According to the same AP story:

Clinton introduced legislation late Friday that would require the Pentagon to begin pulling US forces out of Iraq three months after the bill becomes law, an unlikely scenario given the number of Republicans in Congress and Bush's veto power.

"It's time to say the redeployment should start in 90 days or we will revoke authorization for this war," Clinton said in a statement.

It almost moots my post, almost, considering that the bill will never pass and she's smart enough to know that. At least this bill has teeth and would force everyone 'on record,' as opposed to the 'non-binding' crap. I say go for it, let's lay the cards out now instead of stringing everyone along. It also proves further to me that Kos and his kind can't be pleased.

February 17, 2007

News You Can Lose

News:

War- there are Two (2) wars going on. Two that get any press anyway, happening in Iraq and Afghanistan. It's cold now in Afghanistan so everybody seems to be taking a break. In Iraq the fighting seems to be going on within the newly captured 'green zone' of the US Congress, with Jumpin' Jack Murtha apparently the only one manning the front lines. Mostly he's concerned with R&R for the troops, which should make him popular with the fellahs (and the girls with whips and leashes) in both houses.

Politics- there is an election going on at this very moment that is between Sir Edmond Hillary, Obaba Luther King and Rudolf 'The Red' Giuliani ('Red' because of all the blood on his hands from his free abortion clinics). The outcome will decide who gets to succeed King George II at the end of the new cold war.

Social Issues- Free Speech: Two young 'vaginas' have had their rights to vulgar spewing trampled upon by Lord Breck Edwards. After being expelled from the Hair Lair the two femi-fisting trollops mounted an attack against the Pope for crimes against fashion- all because of that pointy hat.

Sports- Basket-hoop player Tiny Tim Faraway has expressed his pleasure that homosexual players have the decency to wait until retirement to embrace their sexual selves. Commissioner Really Stern punished Señor Faraway for having too much fun by excluding him from future 'special' reindeer games.

Global- Warming. Having scientifically proven the Algore effect (wherein anywhere that Algore goes it gets cold) the former politician has been asked to headline a series of concerts in places like Rio de Janeiro and Bahrain where he dresses up like a College Indian Mascot, sings and dances, and the chemically enhanced audiences wait for "snow."

Entertainment- In a bid of oneupsmanship following a rash of minor female celebrities shaving and showing their hoo-hoos, Britanica Smears has shaven her head. 'Nuff said.

Medicine- according to my inbox I can get generic Viagra for two bucks a pop. And I mean 'pop.'

Asia- in a jealous fit of pique Chinese pigs have hired soothsayers to demand their rights after the Los Angeles Zoo redesigned the Monkey cages using the ancient secret art of Feng Shui. Chinese authorities have responded that Los Angeles is 'not' part of China no matter how many restaurants they have, and that the Monkeys originally asked for the redesign in 2004. It usually takes three Chinese years to get through the red tape. By that time the pigs can expect to be on a steaming plate somewhere.

Local- Being that we can't be everywhere at once local citizen journalists are encouraged to notify us of news imaginings in their home towns. They may deposit verified/non-verified reports in the comments section.

February 11, 2007

In Where 'Jump The Shark' Reaches Global Proportions*

Here is the second installment in my occasional series on GLOBALWARMING. The first essay can be found here in which I make the point that I'd rather be warm than cold. In this installment we take a truncated article from the Financial Times and study it using a tested scientific method. The omitted material may be inferred missing by the replacement phrases 'blah' or 'blahblah' or 'blahblahblah.'

My method will be as one faithfully used in the Blogosphere since the beginning of the second era of the 'Fisking,' though my intemperate use of the 'blah' has rendered a technical Fisking 'deniable.'

(Note by way of explanation: the copyrighted Times material (claiming fair use here!) is set off by the use of "quotation marks" and is indented and centered using the < blockquote > method. 'Blockquote' was one of the first html 'tags' that I learned, neat huh? My own analysis, um, doesn't do that.)

"A series of concerts "bigger than Live Aid"…blahblah…to put the subject of climate change before…blah...a global audience of 2bn."

Holy fucking crap!

"The event, scheduled for July 7, will feature co-ordinated film, music and television events in seven cities including London…blahblah…and Kyoto….blah."

The 'event' will feature 'events.' Tricky, but I don't see how they'll pull this off without using the 'Internets,' which are glaringly not mentioned. Maybe they should consult with Algore.

"It is understood that former US vice-president Al Gore…blahblahblah"

I knew it! It's going to be a surprise! Watch out for your laptops!

"They are promising a line-up of artists to "dwarf" that of the Live8 and Live ….blah"

Heh, they said "dwarf."

"The talent involved is just exponentially bigger because the issue itself is…blah."

A serious point of disbelief here- I need to point out that according to both Darwin 'and' Intelligent Design, exponentially bigger humans are impossible by July 7. This is a rare instance where two usually incompatible 'theories' come together to thwart a marketing point absolutely. Unless they're going to use robots, which would be pretty cool.

"The aim is not just to drive awareness but to get people to take action."

I was not able to institute the use of a 'blah' in the above sentence, as it would render the understanding of the following sentence even more obtuse than it already is. I apologize for the failure.

"These actions are likely to include personal pledges to reduce emissions, for instance by using energy efficient equipment or flying less."

So we're going to put on the biggest shoo since Ed Sullivan to get folk to take 'personal pledges.' Just exactly who is in denial here?

(* Back in the 'Happy Days' Fonzie jumped over a shark on water skis. Nuf said.)

February 10, 2007

Attacking The Concept

Attacking the concept of a "unipolar" world in which the United States was the sole superpower, he said: "What is a unipolar world? No matter how we beautify this term it means one single center of power, one single center of force and one single master."

So said Vladmir Putin as he ratchets up the excuses to enjoy his stolen oil riches after his anticipated retirement next year.

"The message I got from his speech was that Putin wants Russia to have the same position in the world as the former Soviet Union," a senior European official told Reuters.

Well if that means selling weapons to our enemies (Iran) or blackmailing Europe (gas and oil supply extortion) I'm thinking he's already hit the jackpot. If he's talking about 'respect,' like what the USSR enjoyed from the intellectual Western left, he's going to have to strap on a suicide belt to attract their attention, because they've already found a new love.

Perhaps George Bush could strap on some cojones, look him deeply in the eyes and say we are going to send an official observer to the Khodorkovsky trial.

The Primary Race Issue

OBAMA: IF YOU LOOK AFRICAN-AMERICAN, YOU ARE TREATED LIKE ONE
Fri Feb 9 2007 15:51:32 ET

Acknowledging that his presidential campaign has opened a racial debate, Sen. Barack Obama, who has a white mother and an African father, says if you look African-American, you are treated like one. Obama and his wife, Michelle, who also addresses the race issue, appear in an interview with Steve Kroft to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES, Sunday Feb. 11 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS television Network. If, as expected, Obama declares his formal candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination tomorrow, it will be his first interview to be broadcast after that event.

When asked by Kroft if growing up in a white household had caused him to make a decision to be black, Obama replies, "I'm not sure I decided it. I think... if you look African American in this society, you're treated as an African-American." "It's interesting though, that now I feel very comfortable and confident in terms of who I am and where I stake my ground. But I notice that... I've become a focal point for a racial debate," says Obama.

Obama's wife also addresses the race issue when asked by Kroft whether she fears for her husband's life as a black candidate. "I don't lose sleep over it because the realities are that... as a black man... Barack can get shot going to the gas station," says Michelle Obama. "You can't make decisions based on fear and the possibility of what might happen."

Will being African-American hold him back as a candidate? "No.... If I don't win this race it will be because of other factors --[that] I have not shown to the American people a vision for where the country needs to go that they can embrace," Obama tells Kroft.

X X X X X

All right then, race is going to be the issue for at least the primary cycle. I hacked out a treatise the other day after my Black History Month posting, but it was long and unreadable without quite a bit more editing. The above 'flash' report from Drudge however gives me a small dose to comment on, which is how I'll try to address the issue from this point on (in arguably 'small' doses, that is).

Although I'd prefer to treat it as such, one cannot be glib addressing race issues, in the context specifically between white Americans and black Americans. On the surface and out of context, I've certainly been guilty in my life of using racial epithets; for many races, colors and creeds, but I've never harbored the thought that because someone is a certain color or breed (how's that for an inciting word?) they are any more or less better, intelligent or deserving. From a very early age such a concept never made any sense to me. This is the reason for my preference toward glibness: Hey! Grow up and get over it! That's what I got from Dr. King, and I agree with him in that race simply should not be an important issue in everyday life. It's a big world: we're different.

I think white racists are stupid. Period. My 'uncomfortableness' grows however, when I feel the urge to apply that attitude to black racists. It opens up a can of worms and starts to delve deeply into culture, not race. This is where the 'race peddlers' thrive, including a large bulk of white liberals, especially politicians and the news media. Let's start with the cowardly media:

Acknowledging that his presidential campaign has opened a racial debate, Sen. Barack Obama, who has a white mother and an African father, says if you look African-American, you are treated like one.

First off, Obama's presidential campaign has 'not' opened a racial debate; the media and other race baiters have opened the debate in 'response' to the 'campaign.' Read-

"When asked by Kroft"

-in the following paragraph. I don't remember Obama or his campaign bringing up the race issue (which campaign, technically still does not even exist as of this writing. According to the very article above, he has only so far declared his 'intention' to run. Today February 10, 2007 he is expected to 'declare' his candidacy officially, which is when the 'campaign' starts. So much for bringing us the 'news').

When asked by Kroft if growing up in a white household had caused him to make a decision to be black…

What an idiotic question. For one, Obama may have grown up in a 'white' household, but he did so in Indonesia. This one fact, if addressed specifically, could open up a whole new dimension for many people to the 'race' debate. But this is where angels fear to tread, and where the deceptiveness of the whole 'interview event' is exposed. For you 'white' people out there, this interview is not for you. This interview is for black and/or liberal consumption.

Kroft asked a 'black' question. Obama answered an African American question. That's the first trick. What is at issue in this 'opened racial debate,' is not that he's black enough for white people, it is the question of whether he is black enough for black people. Let's translate that into the white experience, which being a combination of Swedish, Irish and Italian growing up in New Jersey, I am qualified to address. I cannot 'decide' to be white, or Italian, or Irish or Swedish. Except on St. Paddy's Day when everyone is Irish, or on the feast of San Gennaro when everyone wants to sample the dishes, or Swedish…well. Again, my desire to be glib rears its ugly head.

Having cracked open the door on the disingenuous media question, let's peek inside at the politician's answer. At first glance Obama's answer seems to be very reasonable, but it is political in the extreme. What caused you to decide to be black?

"I'm not sure I decided it."

OK.

"…if you look African American in this society, you're treated as an African-American."

Let's decipher: To his credit, I personally read that 'race' isn't that important an issue for Obama. The political race is another issue. Who treats Obama as if he's black (or as he puts it, "African-American")? Inherent in his answer, as is the underlying script for the Obama race issue: white folk. Republican Christofascists anyway. Extreme? Follow this from later on in the interview, this time the comment coming from his 'officially black' wife:

"… the realities are that... as a black man... Barack can get shot going to the gas station,"

The first ellipsis is mine. Considering the following two, we can't be sure of what she actually said, which may be open to interpretation, but we know exactly where the 'media' wants us to go. In reality, you or I or anyone 'could' ("can") get "shot" going to the 'gas station.' This statement, this appeal, this whole contrived interview, is addressed to black racists who need to decide for political purposes whether or not Obama is black enough. How can they be moved?

"…if you look African American in this society, you're treated as an African-American," and "as a black man... Barack can get shot going to the gas station."

It is a little less than two years to the next general election. In that time the Democrats need to decide which 'minority' they want in the stew: a woman, or a black man. Obama's mixed race heritage, in the political context, is seen as an advantage to sooth the racial fears of 'white' folk, but that same advantage is seen as a problem for the 'race' crowd, black and white, that makes up so much of the Democratic Party. If he's not seen as 'one of them,' he's got no chance.

Let's go back to the 'leading' question and 'ellipsed' answer to and from Mrs. Obama.

Obama's wife also addresses the race issue when asked by Kroft whether she fears for her husband's life as a black candidate. "I don't lose sleep over it because the realities are that... as a black man... Barack can get shot going to the gas station."

This can be read as a very brave statement and a profound insight into the everyday life of the typical American black person. This stereotype of America is sold day in and day out to the world. Living out of the country and watching the local news as well as talking with people from many countries has been instructive in this. The belief is that when a typical black person walks out the door in the morning he is taking his life in his hands in racist America. Implicit in that attitude is this danger doesn't exist for the White-American. But is this the real, typical American experience?

Therefore, according to above report, Obama is in no more danger running for President than the average black, but that is because the average black is in so much danger simply going to get gas that it doesn't make a difference.

We're already running up against 1500 words here, which in the blog world is already long-winded. But I've only scratched the surface of this one initial interview. And at that, it's only a partial report of the 'interview,' which hasn't been seen yet. Therein lies the rub. The 'race' issue in America has been so twisted and manipulated so as to make addressing it seem almost nonsensical. The news media, the politicians and the average American cannot even agree on a terminology for discussion, as Obama's 'impending' candidacy for the Democratic nominee makes clear. Is he a black man? Is he an African-American? Is he neither? This is ridiculous.

What is the lesson that we are to take away from this experience? This one 'Drudge Flash Report' opens the door to so many questions it's mind-boggling. One could ask, "Is Obama being manipulated?" Well certainly. But by whom, and how deeply complicit is he, and does he have any idea of where he wants to go or where this could lead him? The question to his wife about her worries for his life is a serious one, and has nothing to do with her 'glib' answer about going to get gas.

February 09, 2007

Is Microsoft Contributing to Global Warming?

A FREE Microsoft® Office Live Basics account can help add wings to your
business...

I just got some junk mail from Microsoft that is offering me a chance to win "the Grand Prize [of]—10 hours of private jet travel."

It could get Nancy Pelosi home and back to work one time, although if I won I would find a good restaurant about 30 minutes flying time away and work it.

Iraq During Rush Hour

I thought driving in Cost Rica was dicey- well it is- but you should see this. I need to get me one of them there HumVees. They even work on buses. If you read Arabic you can also go here to see the original page. Wonder what they're saying in the comments? This is the slightly longer (third) version found there.




Not a care in the world.

February 04, 2007

Black History Challenge

All around Hollywood actor, writer, personable personality and rainbow coifed raconteur Luke of LYT Rules fame has issued a call to bloggers to celebrate Black History Month by "post(ing) a picture of a different contemporary black person they admire, every day this month." He then goes on to confuse the issue by posting a picture of "one of my favorite African-American entertainers," and by allowing "half-black people" into the challenge.

I love Luke like a brother (I'm pretty sure we're even friends on MySpace), but I have to say that I think he's fallen prey to the whole racial-industrial complex. That's why I'm a Republican and he's a, well, I don't know exactly what he is, but it's different. Maybe Black-Irish.

But I'll take him up on the challenge for at least this one day and post a photo of my favorite black person (or morena, depending on mood and tan- there's some Portuguese in there somewhere) but decidedly not African-American. Mostly because she's Brazilian. Does it mean I'm racist (being white and all) if I affectionately call her my negro? (Actually it's 'mi negra') She seems to like it when I do that and gets extra friendly.

Anyway, presenting my favorite black person and intimate sparring partner, Claudete:
And in further explicatory celebration, the Violent Femmes (just press play, I know you want to.).



February 03, 2007

Was 9/11 really that bad?

I figured I'd steal that headline from the L.A. Times being that they're not using it anymore. I might even get a spike in my hit counter. The current headline for the same story is "Putting 9/11 into perspective." I like the first one better.

The gist of the article itself could pretty much be summed up as, "Hey, 9/11 wasn't all that bad if you look at the big picture, and we've pretty much overreacted with all this 'war' stuff. We got lots of people; we can take a hit, no? Let's cut out all the fussing now, realize that terrorism is here to stay, and just deal with it."

But I'm not here to further comment on this drivel in my own unique way, I'm here to point you to a rather brilliant critique by one Iowahawk, who actually found a first draft copy of Mr. Bell's eventual article in, of all places, a dumpster behind the Encino Galleria. Mr. Hawk has done the unthinkable and has simply reprinted the germ(s) of thought behind the article au natural. His method is unimpeachable.

Enjoy.

I've saved the original Bell story in the 'continue reading' section below in case it somehow becomes unavailable at the above link. Please credit the Los Angeles Times.

The attacks were a horrible act of mass murder, but history says we're overreacting.
By David A. Bell
January 28, 2007

IMAGINE THAT on 9/11, six hours after the assault on the twin towers and the Pentagon, terrorists had carried out a second wave of attacks on the United States, taking an additional 3,000 lives. Imagine that six hours after that, there had been yet another wave. Now imagine that the attacks had continued, every six hours, for another four years, until nearly 20 million Americans were dead. This is roughly what the Soviet Union suffered during World War II, and contemplating these numbers may help put in perspective what the United States has so far experienced during the war against terrorism.

It also raises several questions. Has the American reaction to the attacks in fact been a massive overreaction? Is the widespread belief that 9/11 plunged us into one of the deadliest struggles of our time simply wrong? If we did overreact, why did we do so? Does history provide any insight?

Certainly, if we look at nothing but our enemies' objectives, it is hard to see any indication of an overreaction. The people who attacked us in 2001 are indeed hate-filled fanatics who would like nothing better than to destroy this country. But desire is not the same thing as capacity, and although Islamist extremists can certainly do huge amounts of harm around the world, it is quite different to suggest that they can threaten the existence of the United States.

Yet a great many Americans, particularly on the right, have failed to make this distinction. For them, the "Islamo-fascist" enemy has inherited not just Adolf Hitler's implacable hatreds but his capacity to destroy. The conservative author Norman Podhoretz has gone so far as to say that we are fighting World War IV (No. III being the Cold War).

But it is no disrespect to the victims of 9/11, or to the men and women of our armed forces, to say that, by the standards of past wars, the war against terrorism has so far inflicted a very small human cost on the United States. As an instance of mass murder, the attacks were unspeakable, but they still pale in comparison with any number of military assaults on civilian targets of the recent past, from Hiroshima on down.

Even if one counts our dead in Iraq and Afghanistan as casualties of the war against terrorism, which brings us to about 6,500, we should remember that roughly the same number of Americans die every two months in automobile accidents.

Of course, the 9/11 attacks also conjured up the possibility of far deadlier attacks to come. But then, we were hardly ignorant of these threats before, as a glance at just about any thriller from the 1990s will testify. And despite the even more nightmarish fantasies of the post-9/11 era (e.g. the TV show "24's" nuclear attack on Los Angeles), Islamist terrorists have not come close to deploying weapons other than knives, guns and conventional explosives. A war it may be, but does it really deserve comparison to World War II and its 50 million dead? Not every adversary is an apocalyptic threat.

So why has there been such an overreaction? Unfortunately, the commentators who detect one have generally explained it in a tired, predictably ideological way: calling the United States a uniquely paranoid aggressor that always overreacts to provocation.

In a recent book, for instance, political scientist John Mueller evaluated the threat that terrorists pose to the United States and convincingly concluded that it has been, to quote his title, "Overblown." But he undercut his own argument by adding that the United States has overreacted to every threat in its recent history, including even Pearl Harbor (rather than trying to defeat Japan, he argued, we should have tried containment!).

Seeing international conflict in apocalyptic terms — viewing every threat as existential — is hardly a uniquely American habit. To a certain degree, it is a universal human one. But it is also, more specifically, a Western one, which paradoxically has its origins in one of the most optimistic periods of human history: the 18th century Enlightenment.

Until this period, most people in the West took warfare for granted as an utterly unavoidable part of the social order. Western states fought constantly and devoted most of their disposable resources to this purpose; during the 1700s, no more than six or seven years passed without at least one major European power at war.

The Enlightenment, however, popularized the notion that war was a barbaric relic of mankind's infancy, an anachronism that should soon vanish from the Earth. Human societies, wrote the influential thinkers of the time, followed a common path of historical evolution from savage beginnings toward ever-greater levels of peaceful civilization, politeness and commercial exchange.

The unexpected consequence of this change was that those who considered themselves "enlightened," but who still thought they needed to go to war, found it hard to justify war as anything other than an apocalyptic struggle for survival against an irredeemably evil enemy. In such struggles, of course, there could be no reason to practice restraint or to treat the enemy as an honorable opponent.

Ever since, the enlightened dream of perpetual peace and the nightmare of modern total war have been bound closely to each other in the West. Precisely when the Enlightenment hopes glowed most brightly, wars often took on an especially hideous character.

The Enlightenment was followed by the French Revolution and the Napoleonic wars, which touched every European state, sparked vicious guerrilla conflicts across the Continent and killed millions (including, probably, a higher proportion of young Frenchmen than died from 1914 to 1918).

During the hopeful early years of the 20th century, journalist Norman Angell's huge bestseller, "The Great Illusion," argued that wars had become too expensive to fight. Then came the unspeakable horrors of World War I. And the end of the Cold War, which seemed to promise the worldwide triumph of peace and democracy in a more stable unipolar world, has been followed by the wars in the Balkans, the Persian Gulf War and the present global upheaval. In each of these conflicts, the United States has justified the use of force by labeling its foe a new Hitler, not only in evil intentions but in potential capacity.

Yet as the comparison with the Soviet experience should remind us, the war against terrorism has not yet been much of a war at all, let alone a war to end all wars. It is a messy, difficult, long-term struggle against exceptionally dangerous criminals who actually like nothing better than being put on the same level of historical importance as Hitler — can you imagine a better recruiting tool? To fight them effectively, we need coolness, resolve and stamina. But we also need to overcome long habit and remind ourselves that not every enemy is in fact a threat to our existence.

David A. Bell, a professor of history at Johns Hopkins University and a contributing editor for the New Republic, is the author of "The First Total War: Napoleon's Europe and the Birth of Warfare as We Know It."

February 01, 2007

Or There And Back Again

Last week I took the car back to the mechanic for some final adjustments before the Panama trip. The power seat had given up the ghost on the tilt function, which left me somehow sitting deep in a bucket with my knees brushing the steering wheel and needing to use my toes to operate the pedals. The exhaust developed a leak as well and the roof decided to not operate which, along with the non-functioning air conditioner should prove for an uncomfortable journey. After three days they had the exhaust leak fixed and changed the oil- nada mas.

So sitting in my bucket I tiptoed the car south and west over the Costa Rican central mountains to the border with Panama. I drove slowly and It wasn't as bad as I had imagined. We left Sunday morning, hit virtually no traffic and the car was responding well to the hills.

We hit the border around 1 PM and had a relatively smooth crossing as I had made all the copies of the paperwork for getting the car across ahead of time. Then the noise started.

We stayed the night in David and the next day managed to find the only German auto mechanic around, but he was in the capital and would be back the following day. I was thinking lifters, as that had been one of the original problems with the car way back when, and decided to head up the hill to Boquete. The car was still strong (though with a 5 liter V-8 you could lose a cylinder or two and still not notice much) so I ignored the noise for the moment.

Boquete is quite beautiful, and has a sharply contrasting climate from the lowlands. Panama is hot. You've probably seen it in the movies, and it's probably exactly like you've seen it. Up the hill though is astonishing. The whole area around the Baru Volcano is considered the breadbasket of Panama, and in fact much of the province of Chiriquí is under cultivation from sugar cane to corn.

We wound up staying at a place well out of our budget plans called La Montaña y el Valle- The Coffee Estate Inn. At $130 a night it's one of the most expensive joints in Boquete, but if you've got it, spend it.

We cater to travelers seeking privacy, quality, comfort, personalized attention and excellent food. We promise what we can deliver and deliver what we promise. There are no unpleasant surprises.

So says the blurb from the website, and I'll just second that. I highly recommend a stay. Just don't forget like I did to bring home some coffee.

So the next day el mechanico Don Roberto was back from Panama City so down the hill we went. One or more of the lifters on the starboard side seemed to be the problem, and it would take a day to get the parts, so we call Don René (with whom I had become acquainted with on my last trip) and hire him and his taxi for the next day. For the remainder of this day we explore David and stay at the Hotel Nacional, an overpriced dump at $70+ a night, but it has a casino which kept the little lady amused at the nickel slots- and where she won more than enough to pay the hotel bill. (Our first night in David was at the $24 a night Alcazar, which also seemed overpriced at the time.)

David is a relatively small city but its downtown section reminds me a bit of downtown Los Angeles. Not the new shiny part, but the part where all the cheap stores occupy the bottom floors of the older buildings while the upper floors remain uninhabited. David lacks only the taller buildings, if not the Spanish language. If David were truly a center for commerce it might be worth setting up a business there, but as you need to travel the six hours to the capital more often than not to buy ordinary items, it's not worth the noise and heat. Plus, all the money is in Panama City.

We went to the 'playa' looking to see what was up and pretty much found nothing. There are no 'beach towns' as we know them, just resort areas with a pavilion or two thrown in for the locals to party at on the weekends. Where we went, the closest beach to David, La Barqueta, there was an old condominium complex, a new hi-rise condo complex being built, a halfway decent resort and one of the aforementioned pavilions. If you had some time and money you could buy land and develop some stuff, but big profits would have to wait.

Off to Concepción to the west, through the pueblos on the south side of the Inter-Americana. Charming little places that would be nice to settle into a slow moving lifestyle. Concepción itself, which is about halfway between David and the Costa Rican border, is getting ready for one of their festivals and is a bustling little town. Very few of the storefronts were vacant, the central park was packed, and there was a good mix of old style businesses and more modern looking ones. The climate was slightly cooler than in the area around David, but not by much. The locals notice the difference. I liked it a lot.

From Concepción we headed north up the hill again to the other side of the volcano from Boquete. Volcán is small, and there are a couple of other pueblos around like Cerro Punta and Nueva California. Volcán seems to have an overabundance of restaurants for its size. Unlike Boquete, Volcán doesn't have a developed 'centro' area, just a strip of local businesses spread out along the main drag and not really conducive to a walking tour.

On the way back down to Concepción we found an abandoned Steak House with a for rent sign that included a phone number in Southern California. Panama, like Costa Rica, is littered with businesses set up by gringos and other foreigners that just didn't work out. They just seem to be more noticeable in Panama. It's a warning that I willfully choose to ignore. The abandoned stand-alone building was a good 2 thousand square feet and just outside the main part of town. It was either never used or only used briefly. The rent wasn't unreasonable, but it would need much work to put it in shape.

We called Roberto the mechanic as it was getting on towards 3 o'clock. He said he was consulting with another technician. Shit.

Back at the repair shop I find that the lifters were just dandy, but this was only found out after they had been replaced. Which means I had to pay for them. The racket was actually coming from one or more of the connecting rods. If you don't know what this means, just figure that it sucks, and that the short block I bought in the United States has failed in a significant way, and there is no reasonably way to return it to be repaired. The car remains in Panama, and we now begin the adventure back north.

"The last bus leaves the border for San José at five-thirty so we have to hurry." Only say that in Spanish. We rush to the frontier and cross over at around five. The only wait was on the Costa Rican side as the immigration official was on break or something. After fifteen minutes we're heading to the ticket booth. But it's closed and the last bus out was at three o'clock. I guess it's high time for a photo or two, so here is Paso Canoas on the Costa Rican side of the border.

Sweet. It was time for food so we settle into a Chinese "steak house" for some kind of grub, which sort of resembled beef, if not steak. At seven or so there is supposed to be a bus that runs from Panama City up through Guatemala, and if we hang out we may find an empty seat or two depending on who they lose going through the border. At six-thirty the bus comes.

Border crossing is never a sure thing even with all your documental ducks in a row. The northward passage through the Americas to the promised lands is especially risky if you happen to be one of the designated 'peoples.' Columbians usually have the most problems as you may well guess, and my dark-skinned Brazilian girlfriend gets all upset when she's mistaken for one. But as she has such a heavy Rio-accented Spanish that about 10 seconds of her yammering is usually all it takes to put smiles on faces all around. It's pretty funny to watch.

The first bus is packed to the gills. Lot's of Asian faces for some reason, all speaking Spanish. I watch the process for the bus people, which is not at all like it is for us just walking across the border. After they go through immigration and get their passports stamped they are subject to a grilling by the customs people and a search of every bag down to women's purses. Three customs officials take 30 minutes to search the bus after everyone gets off. Airport procedures are the opposite. The Costa Rican immigration folks are the ones staring you down while you could pretty much smuggle a live cow through customs- if you could get it into a suitcase.

Now I begin to get nervous. I left Costa Rica with a car, which was documented, and I have a big-ass stamp right in my passport that says so. I'm returning without a car. I'm already in the country and I could just get a taxi to wherever, but I need the bus to San José tonight because the girlfriend has an appointment at the American Embassy in the morning (as of this writing she was missing a financial document relating to her ex: visa denied).

The driver of the second bus sets up shop in front of immigration. Four people won't make it across and there are two seats open for a total of six available places. There are ten people wanting seats including us. We're numbers six and seven. The driver is a really empathetic guy and you can see the pain on his face as he tells people there are no more spaces. A husband and wife missionary team make it, two indigenous religious types with a couple of kids don't (they were really cool folks with cool costumes. I would have liked to talk to them more). The driver turns to us and asks if we could share one seat and we agree, though the prospect of six hours like that, much of it on winding mountain roads, is not my idea of fun. He takes our money and we have a ride. Now through customs.

The bus people leave their passports and forms at immigration and the customs officials then call them one by one to the search tables. We weren't originally on the bus so we fill out our forms separately and hand them to the customs guys directly. This makes one stick-out, and one never wants to do that. We get special treatment. They occasionally make small changes to customs forms and I missed one of the items. As I don't have residency here I have to leave the country every three months or so for 3 days and reenter. This was not one of those times but I have a plethora of exit and entry stamps in my passport.

Why was I here? Where was I? What was I doing? Where am I going? Everything except questions about the car. Technically they could have said I've overstayed my welcome in Costa Rica and booted me back to Panama. As my girlfriend is a legal Costa Rican resident I pretty much pointed at her and let her go into her routine. The icebreaker was the cheap Chanel perfume rip-off she insisted on buying from a couple of guys who molested us in the restaurant. I pointed out the crooked label to one of the customs guys who proceeded to peel it off and everybody got a kick out of it. Bienvenidos a Costa Rica.

We go hang out with the bus driver who was from Cartago. One of the fellas who bought a ticket just before we did was the last guy standing at the customs table. Two cops walked up to him and escorted him away. That meant we each had our own seat.

We pulled out at around nine-thirty PM from the border station. I used to commute from New Jersey into Manhattan quite a bit in the old days and spent many an hour on the bus, but it's been quite a while. The last time I had the pleasure was in Morocco, which was an experience in itself. The roads in Costa Rica aren't in the best shape, and some of the passages through the mountains are quite hairy.

As we began hurtling through the dark I took inventory of my actions should some calamity befall us. I saw they had seat belts, my first notice on any bus, and I reached for the straps between our two seats. One had a clip, one did not. I looked over at my girlfriend, who had her eyes closed already, and buckled in with the good strap. Then the woman behind me started with her knees in my back.

For about an hour I sat upright, staring out the windows as we passed tractor-trailers and slow moving cars, violently switching lanes, which caused the bus to rock enough so that I was bruising my elbow on the hard plastic armrest. I had to lean back into the seat to stop rocking, where I then found a pair of knees. I tested the reclining feature, and as I leaned forward to adjust myself under the seat belt, the woman behind me pushed my seat forward. It was on.

Some years ago I learned what a passive-aggressive personality type was, and that I had one. I took steps to try and be more direct and assertive, and only God knows if it's better or worse. But instead of confronting her directly and asking her to knock it off, I decided to go the old-fashioned route and planted my feet on the floor and pushed back. It actually felt quite good to exercise my legs like that, and as my back was in a state from strange beds and too much time in the car, the added pressure against her knees made my back pain start to go away. As the position also kept me from swinging back and forth with the jerky movement of the bus and thus banging my elbow, this was a win-win situation all the way around.

About a half hour into it I started rubbing my back side to side taking advantage of the free massage and she backed off. The bus pulled into San José around two thirty in the AM and we grabbed a taxi almost at the moment we stepped off the bus. I never turned around to look at her face.